Prospective analysis shows stool culture aids antibiotic therapy during febrile neutropenic phase in HSCT patients.
Background and Aim: Patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs) are at high risk for acquiring healthcare-associated infections, however, invasive infection occurs initially from the gastrointestinal tract during the neutropenic phase. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective study. Stool culture and sensitivity (C/S) were sent to all patients before the conditioning regimen. Our center has a policy of performing surveillance stool cultures for all patients before transplant. These prospective analyses were aimed at studying the surveillance of stool C/S pattern on the pre-HSCT workup of patients. Results: Out of 52 HSCT patients, multiple myeloma – 24 (54%), Hodgkin lymphoma – 13 (25%), followed by mantle cell lymphoma – 5 (10%), T-cell lymphoma – 4 (8%), acute myeloid leukemia (AML) – 1 (1.5%), and severe aplastic anemia (SAA) – 1 (1.5%). Stool surveillance for C/S was sent for all 52 patients undergoing HSCT as part of pretransplant workup, which came positive in 44 patients. The most common microorganisms that came positive were Escherichia coli . The antibiotic susceptibility pattern of E. coli species from the stool surveillance for C/S showed sensitivity to aminoglycosides, piperacillin–tazobactam, meropenem, cefoperazone–sulbactam, and tigecycline. Blood for C/S was sent at times of febrile spikes in 48 (92%) of patients and it came positive in 27 (56%) of patients. The most common organism isolated was Klebsiella pneumoniae species, 10 (37%) showed sensitivity to meropenem, colistin, and tigecycline only. There was no incidence of sepsis or septic shock and also there was no death in our cohort. Conclusion: Concordance between stool C/S and subsequent blood C/S during the febrile neutropenic phase was not seen. Stool surveillance C/S also aids in guiding initial empirical antibiotic therapy during the febrile neutropenic period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: