PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 30, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Impact of Perforated Sheet Geometry on the Insertion Loss of Absorption Silencers

View Full Paper
WKWójciak KamilInstitute of Power EngineeringJKJoanna KopaniaInstitute of Power EngineeringPGP. GajInstitute of Power Engineering

Key Points

  • The central aim is to evaluate how different geometries of perforated sheets affect the performance of absorption silencers in reducing noise.
  • Developed a modular silencer with six perforated sheet designs varying in hole shapes, sizes, and open area ratios.
  • Conducted tests in a large reverberation chamber measuring insertion loss, self-noise, and pressure drop across varying airflow velocities.
  • Tested in the frequency range of 50-10,000 Hz to determine the acoustic performance of each configuration.
  • Configurations provided similar noise attenuation at low frequencies.
  • Silencers with small round perforations (2-6 mm) showed higher insertion loss and lower self-noise in the mid-frequency range between 1,000-5,000 Hz.
  • Larger holes performed better at frequencies above 6,300 Hz, with pressure loss differences between configurations not exceeding 1 Pa.

Abstract

This study evaluates the influence of perforated sheet geometry on the acoustic and aerodynamic performance of absorption silencers. A modular silencer was developed, enabling the installation of six different perforated metal sheets with varying hole shapes (round, square, elongated), sizes (2-20 mm), and open area ratios (22-45%). Glass wool was used as the sound-absorbing filling. Insertion loss, self-noise, and pressure drop were measured in a large reverberation chamber, within the frequency range 50-10,000 Hz, for airflow velocities of 4, 6, and 8 m/s. The results indicate that all configurations provide comparable attenuation at low frequencies. Silencers with small round perforations (diameter 2-6 mm) ensured higher insertion loss and lower self-noise in the 1,000-5,000 Hz mid-frequency range, without any measurable increase in pressure drop compared to variants with larger or elongated holes. For frequencies above 6,300 Hz, perforated sheets with larger holes performed better. Pressure loss differences between all configurations did not exceed 1 Pa at a given flow velocity. The results confirm that aperture size is the primary parameter affecting silencer acoustic effectiveness, while aperture shape and perforation ratio are secondary. These findings provide practical guidelines for optimal silencer design in ventilation systems, ensuring maximum noise reduction with minimal airflow resistance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kamil et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ca1280883daed6ee094e8ahttps://doi.org/10.24423/archacoust.2026.4332
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Measurement of perforate insertion loss with bias flow2025
  2. 2Effects of Geometric Parameters of Perforated Diffuser on Sound Pressure Level Sourced By Airflow2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3New experimental and theoretical methods to model perforated plate in the presence of grazing airflow2025 · 1 citations
  4. 4A practical wedge-disc silencer for marine ventilation: Achieving high insertion loss with minimal axial space and low pressure loss2026
  5. 5Comparative analysis of acoustic absorption performance in micro-perforated panels with multi-shaped perforations: Theory, simulation, and experimental validation2026