PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 30, 2026Cell Reports Methods0 citationsOpen Access

Integrating single-cell and single-nucleus datasets improves bulk RNA-seq deconvolution

View Full Paper
AIAdriana IvichCGCasey S. Greene

Key Points

  • The study aims to determine how integrating single-cell and single-nucleus datasets can enhance the accuracy of bulk RNA sequencing deconvolution.
  • Compared multiple integration strategies across four tissues.
  • Evaluated principal component-based latent shifts and conditional/non-conditional scVI models.
  • Applied cross-modality differential expression filtering for improved accuracy.
  • Conducted real adipose sample analysis to estimate cell fractions.
  • Integration approaches improved deconvolution accuracy over raw snRNA-seq data.
  • Pruning cross-modality differentially expressed genes produced the largest gains in accuracy.
  • Conditional scVI showed comparable performance when matched cell types were unavailable.
  • Bulk samples from adipose tissues provided robust cell-fraction estimates with refined methods.

Abstract

Bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) deconvolution typically uses single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) references, but some cells are only detectable through single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq). Because snRNA-seq captures nuclear, not cytoplasmic, transcripts, its direct use as a reference could reduce deconvolution accuracy. We benchmarked integration strategies across four tissues, comparing principal component (PC)-based latent shifts, conditional and non-conditional scVI (single cell variational inference), and cross-modality differentially expressed gene (DEG) filtering. All approaches improved over raw snRNA-seq, but pruning cross-modality DEGs produced the largest gains, often matching or exceeding scRNA-only references. Conditional scVI performed comparably and was effective when matched scRNA-snRNA cell types were unavailable. In real adipose bulk samples, DEG pruning and conditional scVI provided the most robust cell-fraction estimates across donors and transformations. These results demonstrate that scRNA-seq should be prioritized as a reference when available, and we recommend appending snRNA-seq only after removing cross-modality DEGs; when DEG information is limited, conditional scVI is a practical alternative.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ivich et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ca1280883daed6ee094ea8https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmeth.2026.101346
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper