PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 30, 2026Analytical Chemistry2 citations

A Clinical Lipidomics Platform: Development and Validation of a High-Throughput LC-MS Assay for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment

View Full Paper
TMThomas G. MeikleJWJingqin WuTWTingting Wang

Key Points

  • The study aimed to develop and validate a high-throughput LC-MS/MS assay for comprehensive lipid profiling to assess cardiovascular disease risk.
  • Developed a Clinical Lipidomics Platform (CLP) with a 6-minute LC-MS/MS runtime.
  • Measured 270 lipid species using automated data processing.
  • Validated the platform against 994 samples in the BioHEART-CT Discovery Cohort.
  • Compared lipidomic profiles between CLP and Research Lipidomics Platform (RLP).
  • Calculated a Lipidomic Risk Score (LRS) to assess 10-year cardiovascular risk.
  • CLP derived LRS showed a strong correlation (R² = 0.97) with RLP derived LRS.
  • LRS outperformed traditional risk scores in predicting coronary artery calcium scores.
  • The clinical utility of CLP suggests wider applicability for cardiovascular risk assessment.

Abstract

Traditional lipid biomarkers, such as cholesterol, HDL, LDL, and triglycerides, are frequently used to assess cardiometabolic health in clinical practice. However, these measures provide a limited view of the human lipidome, leaving clinically relevant information untapped. Lipidomic profiling using LC-MS/MS enables the measurement of hundreds of individual lipid species, yet low throughput and complex data processing have limited clinical integration. To overcome these limitations, we developed a Clinical Lipidomics Platform (CLP), a high-throughput (6 min runtime) LC-MS/MS assay measuring 270 lipid species (248 analytes + 22 internal standards) from 37 lipid subclasses in human plasma. The CLP incorporates automated data processing and normalization to an external reference material (NIST SRM 1950) to ensure reproducible and accurate data. We validated the CLP using the BioHEART-CT Discovery Cohort (n = 994) and compared lipidomic data to those from our Research Lipidomics Platform (RLP), which used a 16 min LC gradient and manual data processing to measure >800 lipids. CLP and RLP lipid measurements were highly correlated. A Lipidomic Risk Score (LRS), previously developed to model 10-year cardiovascular event risk using lipidomic, clinical, and demographic data, was calculated for each individual. CLP-derived LRS showed a strong correlation with RLP-derived LRS (R2 = 0.97). The LRS outperformed traditional risk scores, such as the Framingham Risk Score (FRS), in predicting the coronary artery calcium score (CACS), particularly in intermediate-risk individuals. These findings demonstrate the clinical utility of the CLP for cardiovascular risk assessment and its potential for broader clinical application.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Meikle et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ca134b883daed6ee095290https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c04984
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper