PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 31, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología2 citationsOpen Access

Strategic planning and governance in public procurement at a decentralized university in Peru

EFEsteban Eustaquio Flores-ApazaTCTeofila Chanca-MuchaRORolando Ore-Flores

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the relationship between strategic planning and governance in public procurement at a decentralized university in Peru.
  • Mixed descriptive-correlational approach
  • Non-experimental cross-sectional design
  • Evaluation of 152 university employees using a validated questionnaire
  • Review of normative documents
  • Simplified awarding procedures were predominant from 2019-2024.
  • High incidence rate identified during the preparatory stage, causing significant economic damages.
  • Average delays were recorded at 71.6 days.
  • Regulatory Alignment Index indicated a 55% gap with international standards.
  • A significant positive correlation between governance and strategic planning was found (ρ = 0.566; p < 0.01).

Abstract

Introduction The study analyzes the relationship between strategic planning and governance in public procurement at a decentralized public university in Peru, considering its implications for efficiency, transparency, and regulatory compliance. Methods A mixed descriptive-correlational approach was applied using a non-experimental cross-sectional design, evaluating 152 university employees using a validated questionnaire ( α 0.71) and a review of normative documents. Results The findings reveal a predominance of simplified awarding procedures (2019-2024) and a high incidence rate in the preparatory stage, identified as the main operational bottleneck, resulting in economic damages of up to 2,982,623.50 PEN and average delays of 71.6 days. The Regulatory Alignment Index (55%) indicates gaps with international standards. A significant positive correlation was found between governance and planning ( ρ = 0.566; p 0.01), with moderate explanatory power ( R 2 = 0.3295). Discussion These results suggest that, despite acceptable operational performance, structural weaknesses persist in governance and strategic planning. The identified gaps highlight the need to incorporate sustainability, life-cycle approaches, and project management methodologies. An adaptive model integrating public value, efficiency, transparency, and sustainability is proposed to strengthen governance and align university procurement with global best practices.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Flores-Apaza et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cb63c9e6a8c024954b87c0https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2026.1683342
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper