PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 31, 2026Frontiers in Microbiology0 citationsOpen Access

A novel scoring system for precise severity quantification in severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome: development and application based on dynamic clinical data

YSYingchun SunZPZhiyu PanJSJing Sun

Key Points

  • To create a quantitative scoring system for assessing the severity of Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (SFTS) using clinical data.
  • Conducted a retrospective study with 547 confirmed SFTS patients from two hospitals.
  • Data were collected over a 14-day course, segmented into four phases.
  • Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests for survival outcomes.
  • A prospective cohort of 44 patients was used for external validation of the scoring system.
  • Out of 547 patients, 96 (17.55%) were non-survivors.
  • The scoring system stratified patients into three risk groups: low (0-3 points), intermediate (4-7 points), and high (8-11 points), with adverse outcomes of 1.04%, 22.92%, and 76.04%, respectively.
  • The scoring system was validated with an AUC between 0.810 and 0.952, indicating excellent performance.

Abstract

Background Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (SFTS) is an acute infectious disease with high mortality. This study aimed to develop a quantitative scoring system for grading SFTS severity using dynamic clinical data. Methods A retrospective study included 547 confirmed SFTS patients from two hospitals. Clinical data were collected over a 14-day course (divided into four phases). Patients were grouped into survivors ( n = 451) and non-survivors ( n = 96). Statistical analyses, including Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank tests, were performed. A prospective external validation cohort of 44 newly diagnosed patients was subsequently enrolled to validate the scoring system using C-statistic, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results Of 547 patients, 96 (17.55%) were non-survivors. Multivariate logistic regression identified six independent prognostic factors across phases: age, platelet (PLT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and creatinine (Cr) (days 5–7); age, red blood cell distribution width (RDW), Cr, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (days 8–10); Cr and LDH (days 11–14). A scoring system (0–11 points) was developed, stratifying patients into low (0–3), intermediate (4–7), and high (8–11) risk groups, with adverse outcome rates of 1.04, 22.92, and 76.04%, respectively. Kaplan–Meier curves showed significant prognostic differences (log-rank p 0.001). External validation (44 cases) confirmed excellent performance: AUC 0.810–0.952, good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow p 0.05), and net clinical benefit (DCA Eavg 0.068–0.098, Emax 0.422–0.559). Conclusion A dynamic SFTS severity scoring system was developed and validated. Internal and external validation confirmed its reliability and clinical utility, providing a simple, practical tool for timely assessment and early intervention.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cb63c9e6a8c024954b87c8https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2026.1811615
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper