PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 31, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Impact of environmental management accounting adoption on sustainability performance: Mediating role of corporate governance

SASulaiman Alsughayer

Key Points

  • This research explores how institutional pressures affect the adoption of environmental management accounting and its impact on sustainability performance, considering corporate governance as a mediator.
  • Analyzed data from a survey of 298 publicly listed companies in Saudi Arabia.
  • Utilized partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) for hypothesis testing.
  • Collected responses from executives, financial managers, accountants, and board members via questionnaires.
  • Institutional pressures significantly positively influence environmental management accounting adoption.
  • Environmental management accounting positively affects environmental, social, and economic performance.
  • Corporate governance significantly mediates the relationship between institutional pressures and environmental management accounting.

Abstract

Type of the article: Research ArticleAbstractThe study aims to explore the effect of institutional pressures (INP) on environmental management accounting (EMA) and the mediating role of sustainable corporate governance (SCG) on the effects of EMA on sustainability performance. The partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was applied to test the hypotheses. Data were gathered through a survey of 298 publicly listed companies in Saudi Arabia, using questionnaires distributed to executives, financial managers, accountants, and board members. The results show that INP has a significant positive effect on EMA (β = 0.295, T = 6.062); in turn, EMA has a significant positive effect on environmental (β = 0.295), social (β = 0.332), and economic (β = 0.332) performance. Mediation analysis demonstrates that SCG acts as a significant mediator between INP and EMA (β = 0.113, T = 2.366), and EMA shows significant mediation between INP and environmental (β = 0.115), social (β = 0.126), and economic (β = 0.174) performance. These findings demonstrate that INP has both direct and indirect impacts on sustainability performance through EMA. A robust SCG structure strengthens the linkage between external INP and EMA adoption and provides the linkage with an internal legitimating mechanism. These outcomes bring forward the role of EMA as a mediating variable for materializing the effects of external pressures driven by the legitimacy needs into sustainability performance. The findings add to the body of knowledge of institutional theory by emphasizing the role of concurrent external institutional forces and internal factors that affect corporate sustainability performance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sulaiman Alsughayer (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cb63c9e6a8c024954b87fdhttps://doi.org/10.21511/ee.17(1).2026.13
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper