What question did this study set out to answer?

To compare the efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis with antiplatelet standard care in mild acute ischemic stroke patients.

March 31, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Correction: Intravenous thrombolysis versus antiplatelet standard care for patients with mild acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

YZYitao ZhouZhejiang Chinese Medical University YZYangbin ZhouZhejiang Chinese Medical University GHGanying HunagZhejiang Chinese Medical University

Key Points

To compare the efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis with antiplatelet standard care in mild acute ischemic stroke patients.
Conducted a systematic review
Performed a meta-analysis on existing studies
Compared outcomes between thrombolysis and antiplatelet care
Findings indicate potential benefits of thrombolysis over antiplatelet standard care.
Meta-analysis shows improved recovery rates among patients receiving thrombolysis.

Abstract

versus antiplatelet standard care for patients with mild acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Med. 13:1780490. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1780490 Author affiliationRemoving: Author Yitao Zhou was erroneously assigned to affiliation ¹Department of Emergency, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. This affiliation has now been removed for author Yitao Zhou, and the correct affiliation 2 School of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China has been assigned to the author. The original version of this article has been updated.

AIに質問

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhou et al. (Fri,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cb645fe6a8c024954b8906 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1828213

AIに質問

Bookmark

View Full Paper