Explores how leadership traits drive AI adoption for service personalization, suggesting new management strategies.
Purpose Drawing on upper echelon theory, this study investigates how the psychological characteristics of the top management team (TMT) drive the strategic choice to adopt AI-enabled market intelligence to achieve service personalization. It positions leadership not as reactive to market pressures, but as a proactive force in organizational technological transformation. Design/methodology/approach A multi-source, time-lagged survey design was employed. Data were collected from 151 tourism and hospitality firms in Pakistan, with separate surveys administered to first-line managers, TMT members and customers. The data were aggregated to the firm level and analyzed using structural equation modeling in SmartPLS 4. Findings The results confirm that a TMT’s risk tolerance and strategic vision are primary catalysts for achieving service personalization. Furthermore, AI-enabled market intelligence mediates this relationship, and competitive intensity amplifies the effect of TMT characteristics on the adoption of AI-enabled market intelligence. Practical implications The findings offer managers a clear leadership development and strategic roadmap: cultivating a TMT with high risk tolerance and a strong strategic vision is essential for navigating digital transformation and building a sustainable competitive advantage through personalized service. Originality/value This research presents a novel extension of upper echelon theory by demonstrating that in high-uncertainty contexts, directly measurable psychological traits of leaders are potent drivers of strategic change. It clarifies the “black box” between TMT characteristics and organizational outcomes by identifying AI-enabled market intelligence as a tool for achieving strategic differentiation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: