Research computes the Picard–Lefschetz Stokes constant in Class A, confirming critical numerical relationships.
Paper 16 in the Non-Holomorphic Fractal Series. Papers 12–15 fixed the sign, exact exponent, and Picard–Lefschetz definition of the Class A Stokes constant S₁ᴬ(α) but left its normalized magnitude and α-dependence as open numerical questions. In this paper we compute the Picard–Lefschetz normalized magnitude |S₁ᴬ|_PL(α) on a 13-point α-grid using the Watson–Borel–alien route: we build the Watson generating function G_A(s; α) = ₂F₁(1/2, p; p + 1/2; s) with p = 1 − α/2, evaluate its branch-cut discontinuity at the first Borel singularity s = 1 via high-precision Padé approximants and direct ₂F₁ evaluation, and convert the jump to a Stokes magnitude via the Picard–Lefschetz bridge equation |S₁ᴬ|_PL = |Δω|/(2π). All 13 values satisfy arg S₁ᴬ = π (real negative), confirming Paper 12 at every grid point. After factoring out α1/3, the residual f(α) = |S₁ᴬ|_PL(α)/α1/3 is smooth and strongly suppressed as α → 1. On the high-α slice [0.80, 0.99] the data obey the two-parameter universality law |S₁ᴬ|_PL(α) ≈ α1/3 K(1−α)^δ, K ≈ 4.49 × 10⁻⁸, δ ≈ 1.05, with relative error below 3% at every fitted point. This Picard–Lefschetz Stokes constant law is the numerical capstone of the Class A programme.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Bird (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: