PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 31, 2026Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics0 citationsOpen Access

The role of abdominal compression in the reduction of respiratory motion for cardiac radioablation

View Full Paper
JMJakob MarshallABAlanah BergmanTKTania Karan

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of abdominal compression in minimizing respiratory-induced motion during cardiac radioablation treatment.
  • Imaged nine patients using bi-planar fluoroscopy at 5 Hz for 15-20 seconds under both abdominal compression and free breathing conditions.
  • Tracked the position of the ICD lead tip as a motion surrogate in bi-planar images.
  • Quantified respiratory-induced motion parameters such as peak-to-peak motion extent and total 3D displacement.
  • Average respiratory-induced motion was reduced from 3.0 mm under free breathing to 2.1 mm under abdominal compression.
  • Eight out of nine patients showed decreased mean 3D displacement with abdominal compression, averaging 2.2 mm compared to 3.2 mm under free breathing.
  • Standard deviation of motion also decreased under abdominal compression, indicating more consistent positioning of patients.

Abstract

Abstract Background Research on cardiac radioablation (CR) has highlighted the importance of accounting for respiratory‐induced motion during treatment, promoting investigation into methods to reduce its impact. Purpose To investigate the efficacy of abdominal compression (AC) to reduce respiratory‐induced motion for CR patients by quantifying their respiratory‐induced motion under AC and free breathing (FB) conditions. Methods and materials Nine patients were imaged with 5 Hz bi‐planar fluoroscopy on the Vero4DRT linear accelerator for 15–20 seconds under both AC and FB conditions in preparation for CR. As the soft tissue target is not visible on bi‐planar X‐ray images, the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) lead tip was used as a motion surrogate. The position of the ICD lead tip was tracked and triangulated in each bi‐planar image frame, with the respiratory component of motion extracted using a lowpass filter. Properties of respiratory‐induced motion were quantified including the average (across patient breaths) peak‐to‐peak motion extent, the mean total 3D magnitude of displacement, and the standard deviation of motion for each patient. Results The average (95% CI) extent of RV lead respiratory‐induced motion was 3.0 (1.1, 5.0), 2.8 (1.6, 4.1), 7.0 (4.2, 9.7) mm under FB and 2.1 (1.4, 2.8), 2.7 (1.7, 3.8), 4.7 (3.5, 5.9) mm under AC in the right–left, anterior–posterior, inferior–superior directions. Eight out of nine patients had a reduction in the mean respiratory‐induced total 3D displacement under AC, with an average ( STD) across patients of (3.2 1.7) mm under FB and (2.2 0.8) mm under AC. Averaged across patients, the standard deviation (95% CI) of respiratory‐induced motion was 1.3 (0.5, 2.0), 1.2 (0.7, 1.6), 3.1 (1.7, 4.5) mm under FB and 0.9 (0.6, 1.3), 1.2 (0.6, 1.8), 2.0 (1.3, 2.7) mm under AC. Conclusions For eight out of nine CR patients investigated, the respiratory‐induced RV lead motion was reduced when using AC compared to FB conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Marshall et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cb6541e6a8c024954b94ddhttps://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70561
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper