PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 31, 2026ChemSusChem0 citations

Synthetic Sweeteners as Novel CEI‐Stabilizing Electrolyte Additives for Li‐Ion Batteries

View Full Paper
NINatalia IzdebskaPDPiotr DąbrowskiMSMaciej Smoliński

Key Points

  • This research aims to identify cost-effective synthetic sweeteners that can serve as electrolyte additives to stabilize lithium-ion battery interfaces and enhance cycling performance.
  • Investigated food-grade synthetic sweeteners and lithium salts as electrolyte additives for lithium-ion batteries.
  • Used LCO cathodes cycled with carbonate-based electrolytes containing varying concentrations of AceLi and SachLi.
  • Evaluated performance through galvanostatic cycling at different C-rates and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS).
  • Low to moderate concentrations of AceLi and SachLi significantly improved discharge capacity retention at elevated C rates.
  • The optimum concentration observed was around 0.2 wt.% of the additives.
  • XPS analysis revealed specific decomposition products that contribute to protective layer formation at the electrode/electrolyte interface.

Abstract

One of the key challenges in the development of next‐generation lithium‐ion batteries is designing cost‐effective electrolyte additives that can simultaneously stabilize electrode/electrolyteinterfaces and sustain high‐rate cycling. This work explores the use of food‐grade synthetic sweeteners and their lithium salts—lithium acesulfame (AceLi) and lithium saccharinate (SachLi)—as functional electrolyte additives for LCO cathodes. Synthetic sweeteners are mass‐produced for the food industry, which makes them inexpensive, readily available at high purity, and structurally attractive due to the presence of sulfonyl, carbonyl, and aromatic groups that can participate in interfacial reactions. LCO half‐cells were cycled with carbonate‐based electrolytes containing different concentrations of AceLi and SachLi, and their performance was evaluated by galvanostatic cycling at variable C‐rates, long cycling under a stable C‐rate, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Rate capability tests show that low to moderate concentrations of AceLi and SachLi markedly improve discharge capacity retention at high C rates compared to the additive‐free electrolyte, with the optimum effect observed near 0.2 wt.% additive. XPS analysis of the cathode–electrolyte interphase (CEI) confirms additive‐specific decomposition products, including high‐oxidation‐state sulfur (e.g., ca. 170 eV S 2p peak for Li 2 SO 3 , ROSO 3 Li, or ‐SO 2 ‐), nitrogen species (‐SNC‐, ‐NCO‐ in N 1s), and Li 2 CO 3 (C 1s), supporting the formation of a protective CEI that enhances high‐rate performance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Izdebska et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cb6541e6a8c024954b9675https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202502751
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper