PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 31, 2026Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques0 citations

Construction of an Intelligent Decision-Making Model for Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Repair

View Full Paper
XWXuhao WangWenzhou Medical UniversityYSYuesheng SunWenzhou Medical UniversityXXXiaopan XuZhejiang Chinese Medical University

Key Points

  • The aim is to create a decision-support model using machine learning to help surgeons choose between two bile duct repair strategies during surgery.
  • Retrospective analysis of clinical data from 117 patients undergoing laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.
  • Patients categorized into primary duct closure and T-tube drainage groups.
  • Feature selection performed using methods like SelectKBest and Recursive Feature Elimination.
  • Multiple machine learning classifiers trained and evaluated for performance metrics like accuracy and AUC.
  • Baseline characteristics were similar across groups, with the TTD group showing higher total protein and more purulent bile.
  • Five optimal predictive features identified: age, white blood cells, C-reactive protein, total protein, albumin.
  • Random Forest classifier showed best performance with AUC of 0.83, accuracy of 0.72, precision of 0.87, and recall of 0.62.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based decision-support model to assist surgeons in intraoperatively selecting the optimal repair strategy (primary duct closure PDC versus T-tube drainage TTD) following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). Methods: Clinical data from 117 patients with common bile duct stones (CBDS) who underwent LCBDE were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into PDC ( n = 66) and TTD ( n = 51) groups. After baseline comparison using SPSS, the dataset was standardized and split. Feature selection was performed using SelectKBest, Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), and RFE with Cross-Validation (RFECV). Several machine learning classifiers were trained and evaluated based on accuracy, F1 score, precision, recall, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for higher total protein and more frequent purulent bile in the TTD group. RFE identified five optimal predictive features: age, white blood cells, C-reactive protein, total protein, and albumin. The Random Forest classifier, combined with RFE feature selection, demonstrated the best predictive performance, achieving an AUC of 0.83, an accuracy of 0.72, a precision of 0.87, and a recall of 0.62. Conclusion: We successfully constructed an intelligent decision-making model for laparoscopic bile duct repair. Utilizing RFE and Random Forest, the model identifies key clinical features to provide personalized surgical recommendations, which may enhance precision treatment for patients with CBDS.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cb6556e6a8c024954b96bdhttps://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261427263
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Combining Clinical-Radiomics Features With Machine Learning Methods for Building Models to Predict Postoperative Recurrence in Patients With Chronic Subdural Hematoma: Retrospective Cohort Study2024 · 14 citations
  2. 2C-reactive Protein-to-Albumin Ratio: A Useful Predictor for Biliary Fistula After Hepatectomy2024 · 3 citations
  3. 3The efficacy and safety of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary duct closure for cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis2024 · 6 citations
  4. 4Aging tsunami coming: the main finding from China’s seventh national population census2021 · 293 citations
  5. 5Immunogenic alteration in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration2013 · 19 citations