PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026MethodsX2 citationsOpen Access

Community-Based Interventions to Improve Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis

View Full Paper
WKWarinmad KedthongmaSUSopon UsapromWPWuttiphong Phakdeekul

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of community-based and digital interventions in improving tuberculosis treatment completion.
  • Conducted a meta-analysis of studies from multiple databases including PubMed and Scopus.
  • Included 20 controlled trials with a total of 76,757 participants.
  • Applied a random-effects model to calculate pooled odds ratios and confidence intervals.
  • Community-aligned and digital interventions increased TB treatment completion (pooled OR = 1.11; 95% CI: 1.02–1.20).
  • High between-study heterogeneity was noted, yet positive effects were consistent across settings.
  • Social factors like food security and health literacy were significant moderators of treatment outcomes.

Abstract

• Community-aligned and digital interventions significantly improve TB treatment completion (pooled OR = 1.11; 95% CI: 1.02–1.20). • Social determinants—including food security, economic stability, and health literacy—substantially moderate treatment outcomes. • Integrating behavioural and socioeconomic support into routine TB programmes enhances programme resilience across diverse healthcare settings. More than a century of medical progress has not reduced tuberculosis (TB) as a leading global health threat. The challenge is not drug availability but treatment completion. The 10.7 million new cases and 1.23 million deaths reported in 2024 underscore that biomedical solutions alone are insufficient. Recovery depends on both medication and the social contexts patients face. Digital and community-led interventions aim to close this gap, yet a rigorous synthesis of their pooled effectiveness remains unavailable. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Dimensions, the Cochrane Library, and ThaiJO for records from 2021 to 2025. Two reviewers independently assessed study quality via JBI tools. A random-effects model was applied. Pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were computed in JASP (version 0.19). We identified 17,208 records and ultimately included 20 controlled trials (n = 76,757 participants). Using restricted maximum likelihood estimation in a random-effects framework, community-aligned and digital interventions improved the likelihood of TB treatment completion (pooled OR = 1.11; 95% CI: 1.02–1.20; p = 0.018). Between-study heterogeneity was high (Q = 90.24; p < .001; τ² = 0.02), yet the direction of effect was consistently positive across settings. TB treatment efficacy extends beyond pharmacological potency; recovery is substantially determined by patients’ social stability, food security, and capacity to maintain adherence. Effective TB control must therefore integrate socioeconomic support alongside medical regimens to achieve meaningful outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kedthongma et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ccb55116edfba7beb8757fhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2026.103893
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper