Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In vitro study finds no significant change in fracture resistance with Cavo bevel in primary molars, suggesting other benefits.
Background: Glass ionomer cements (GICs) are commonly used for restorations in primary molars due to their adhesive, hydrophilic, and bioactive properties. However, their low mechanical resistance may limit their use in proximal cavities. Recent advancements in GICs, such as the high viscosity GIC EQUIA Forte®, have improved their mechanical properties. The effect of a Cavo superficial bevel on the mechanical strength of GIC restorations has been previously studied. Objectives: To investigate the effect of a Cavo superficial bevel on fracture resistance and the type of fracture (adhesive, cohesive, or catastrophic) in EQUIA Forte® GIC restorations in primary molars. Methods: 56 standardized proximal cavities were created on 51 temporary molars. The cavities were randomly divided into two groups: group I without a Cavo superficial bevel (n=28) and group II with a 45° Cavo superficial bevel (n=28). The cavities were restored with EQUIA Forte®. The samples were subjected to thermocycling and artificial aging, then, an axial speed loading of 1 mm/min was applied until fracture. Fracture toughness was recorded, and the type of fracture was observed under an optical microscope. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the average fracture resistance between the groups. All tests were two-tailed and the level of significance was set at 5%. Results: The average fracture resistance for group I was (237.57 ± 139.97 N) and for group II was (294.89 ± 171.07 N). There was no statistically significant difference in fracture resistance between the two groups (p>0.05). Mixed fractures were observed in all samples, with adhesive fractures only present in group I and cohesive fractures only present in group II. Conclusion: The Cavo superficial bevel does not significantly affect the fracture resistance of GIC restorations in primary molars. However, the bevel design may prevent adhesive and catastrophic fractures. Contexte : Les ciments verres-Ionomères (CVI) sont couramment utilisés pour les restaurations des molaires temporaires grâce à leurs propriétés adhésives, hydrophiles et bioactives. Cependant, leur faible résistance mécanique limite leur utilisation dans les cavités proximales. Avec les récents progrès de cette classe de matériaux, un CVI à haute viscosité a été introduit : EQUIA Forte®, visant à améliorer leurs propriétés mécaniques. Le rôle du biseau cavo-superficiel sur la résistance mécanique des restaurations au CVI a déjà été étudié. Objectifs : Tester le rôle du biseau dans l’amélioration de la résistance à la fracture et d’étudier la nature du trait de fracture adhésif, cohésif, ou catastrophique des restaurations
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
FIKANI et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: