PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026Heritage1 citationsOpen Access

Visualising Relation Between Terminologies and HBIM Models for Historic Architecture

View Full Paper
APAlberto PettineoSPSandro Parrinello

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a structured information system for organizing and interpreting heritage data through HBIM models.
  • Utilized a framework from the European Horizon MSCA project Hephaestus.
  • Focused on the Adriatic Cultural Heritage Routes and fortified architectural designs.
  • Adopted a mixed approach combining top-down and bottom-up processes.
  • Demonstrated the ability to structure HBIM data within an ontology-based framework.
  • Showed how architectural elements and territorial entities could be interconnected.
  • Highlighted adaptability of models to various scales and interpretive contexts.

Abstract

Moving beyond the limits of purely geometric or descriptive documentation, the study conceives the digital models as a structured information system capable of coherently and queryably organising both the formal-typological and the interpretative-historical dimensions of heritage. The methodology is developed within the framework of the European Horizon MSCA project Hephaestus, which investigates cross-border Cultural Heritage Routes (CHRs) and historic fortification systems in the Adriatic and Baltic basins. The paper focuses on Adriatic CHR, through the selection, organisation, and interrelation of a distributed corpus of fortified architectures, articulated according to historical phases, territorial clusters, typological classes, and multilevel relationships. The study adopts an approach centered on HBIM models and ontological frameworks, implemented through complementary top-down and bottom-up processes. The results show the possibility of structuring HBIM-derived data within an ontology-based framework capable of linking, within a single information system, architectural elements, fortified systems, and territorial entities across heterogeneous case studies. The application to differentiated contexts highlights the ability of the models to adapt to different scales and levels of complexity, supporting querying, comparison, and multi-level interpretation of heritage. The variety of sources and contexts enables the methodology to be tested across heterogeneous historical and typological scenarios, strengthening its applicability and robustness within a multiscalar information structure.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pettineo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ccb5d116edfba7beb87947https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage9040140
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper