PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026Crystals2 citationsOpen Access

Anodization Parameter-Driven Control of Nucleation, Pore Formation and Hydrophobic Behavior in Anodic Aluminum Oxide Nanostructures

View Full Paper
SBSezer BalkanMYMetin Yurddaşkal

Key Points

  • The aim is to investigate how anodization parameters influence the morphology and hydrophobic properties of anodic aluminum oxide (AAO).
  • Fabrication of AAO on 6xxx series aluminum alloy via a two-step anodization method.
  • Anodization parameters varied: voltage (20-60 V) for 60 min, and time (30-120 min) at a fixed voltage of 30 V.
  • Characterization using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and contact angle measurements.
  • Pore diameters ranged from 13.3–40.6 nm in Group 1 and 19.1–23.6 nm in Group 2.
  • Higher anodization voltage led to larger pores and reduced pore density.
  • The water contact angle increased from ~45° for non-anodized samples to ~123° for optimum AAO surfaces, indicating better hydrophobicity.

Abstract

This study reports the fabrication of porous anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) on a 6xxx series aluminum alloy by a two-step anodization route and systematically examines how anodization parameters govern the resulting morphology and wetting behavior. AAO samples were prepared in two groups: in Group 1, the anodization voltage was varied between 20 and 60 V at a fixed time of 60 min; in Group 2, the anodization time was varied between 30 and 120 min at a fixed voltage of 30 V. All anodizations were carried out in 0.3 M oxalic acid at room temperature. The AAO structures were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and contact angle measurements. The pore diameters and interpore distances were found to be 13.3–40.6 nm and 45.3–86.7 nm, respectively, in Group 1, and 19.1–23.6 nm and 41.0–44.4 nm in Group 2. Analysis of SEM images reveals that increasing the anodization voltage results in larger pore diameters, interpore spacings, and porosity, but a reduced pore density. In contrast, changes in anodization time at a fixed voltage have a more modest effect on pore geometry. The anodized surfaces exhibit a marked change in wettability, with the water contact angle increasing from ~45° for the non-anodized alloy to ~123° for the best-performing AAO surface, without any additional chemical modification. These results demonstrate that, even under simple room-temperature conditions, AAO morphology and hydrophobic behavior can be tuned in a predictable manner by appropriate choice of anodization parameters, which is relevant for the design of membranes, sensors, and functional surface coatings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Balkan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ccb63f16edfba7beb87e29https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst16040227
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper