Evaluates the performance of POME-based microbial fuel cells in wastewater treatment and energy recovery, suggesting avenues for improvement.
Palm oil mill effluent (POME) represents a major environmental burden due to its exceptionally high organic load and complex pollutant profile. Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) offer a distinctive waste-to-energy platform capable of simultaneously treating POME while recovering electrical energy through microbial metabolism. This study evaluates the performance of POME-fed MFCs across three interrelated dimensions: wastewater treatment efficiency, electrochemical energy recovery, and electron loss mechanisms that constrain system performance. Reported chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiencies range from approximately 40% to over 90%, with the highest values typically achieved in hybrid configurations incorporating sorptive or redox-active materials. Power densities span several orders of magnitude, from below 2 mW m⁻² to above 600 mW m⁻² under highly optimized laboratory conditions; however, most POME-fed systems operate within a much narrower and more practically relevant range of roughly 10–500 mW m⁻², reflecting substrate complexity, mass-transfer limitations, and competing microbial pathways. Coulombic efficiencies (CE) are generally low, commonly below 50%, indicating that a substantial fraction of substrate-derived electrons is diverted to methanogenesis, aerobic respiration, biomass synthesis, and other non-electrogenic sinks rather than current generation. Collectively, the available evidence demonstrates that while POME-MFCs can achieve substantial organic removal, sustained electrical output remains constrained by fundamental biological and electrochemical trade-offs, underscoring the need for integrated reactor design, microbial management, and process control to improve practical viability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: