A framework improves decision-making in multi-agent systems, enhancing perception and adaptation under uncertainty.
Multi-agent perception systems must operate under fundamental asymmetries: some agents provide fast but unreliable observations, while others deliver higher-quality evidence with delay and uncertain correspondence. Traditional deterministic orchestration and rule-based fusion struggle to manage these trade-offs, often producing brittle or unstable behavior. We introduce a probabilistic orchestration framework that treats coordination as an epistemic generation problem—constructing and updating belief states under uncertainty—rather than a selection problem. Instead of committing to a single agent’s output, the orchestrator constructs a belief state that explicitly represents uncertainty, evidential provenance, and temporal relevance. Decisions are produced through latency-aware, association-weighted fusion, and uncertainty itself becomes a first-class signal governing action, deferral, and learning. Crucially, the orchestrator enables controlled teacher–student adaptation: high-confidence, well-associated stationary observations are gated into a feedback loop that improves ego perception over time while mitigating error amplification. We demonstrate the approach on an infrastructure-assisted dual-camera obstacle-recognition task. Experimental results show improved robustness to distance, occlusion, and delayed evidence compared to ego-only and deterministic orchestration baselines. By operationalizing orchestration as epistemic generation, this work provides a unifying framework for robust decision-making and safe adaptation in multi-agent systems, with implications that extend beyond perception to agentic and generative AI architectures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bovshover et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: