The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of seasonal changes in the chemical and structural composition of giant miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus) biomass on the performance, kinetics, and efficiency of anaerobic digestion (AD), as well as on the overall energy and techno-economic balance of the conversion chain. The AD performance was assessed using batch biochemical methane potential (BMP) assays conducted for eight harvest dates (June–January). Comprehensive characterization included fundamental physicochemical properties of the biomass, lignocellulosic fraction composition, AD kinetics, and methane production yield. A statistically significant (p < 0. 05) increase in structural fiber fractions was observed with advancing plant maturity, accompanied by a progressive decline in specific methane yield from 281 ± 32 mL CH4/g VS in June to 170 ± 11–172 ± 13 mL CH4/g VS in winter harvests. Despite a relatively stable theoretical biochemical methane potential (TBMP) ranging from 425 to 443 mL CH4/g VS, the conversion efficiency (BMP/TBMP) decreased from approximately 66% to below 40%, indicating increasing structural and kinetic limitations to substrate biodegradability. Kinetic parameters deteriorated systematically in late harvests, as reflected by a reduction in the first-order rate constant kCH4 from 0. 115 to approximately 0. 072 1/d and an extension of the lag phase λ from 2. 19 to over 4 days. Regression analysis revealed strong negative correlations between lignocellulosic complex content and both BMP and kCH4, whereas the C/N ratio exhibited a positive association with process performance under the experimental conditions applied. The highest methane production per hectare (3904 ± 720 m3CH4/ha) and the most favorable economic outcome (1979 ± 465 EUR/ha) were achieved for the September harvest. The results demonstrate that harvest timing constitutes a critical optimization parameter in lignocellulosic biogas systems, governing not only methane yield and process kinetics but also the overall energy output and economic viability of the bioenergy production chain.
Brózda et al. (Sat,) studied this question.