Key result
Model combining inflammation, anatomy, and RBBB predicts post-TAVR pacemaker implantation, with RBBB linked to ~364% greater risk.
Why the study?
Permanent pacemaker implantation is a common complication after TAVR, and identifying predictors, particularly immune-inflammatory markers, could enhance pre-procedural risk stratification.
Can clinical, anatomical, and immune-inflammatory markers predict permanent pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing TAVR with self-expandable valves?
Can clinical, anatomical, and immune-inflammatory markers predict permanent pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing TAVR with self-expandable valves?
A predictive model combining inflammatory markers (NLR, SII), anatomical factors, and procedural details accurately estimates the risk of permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVR with self-expandable valves.
Background Permanent Pacemaker Implantation (PPI) is a common complication following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Identifying predictors, particularly immune-inflammatory markers, can enhance pre-procedural risk stratification. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 587 patients undergoing TAVR with self-expandable valves. We assessed clinical, anatomical, and inflammatory parameters, focusing on five complete blood count-derived ratios: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and eosinophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (ELR). Multivariable logistic regression models were developed to identify predictors of PPI. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves evaluated the discriminative ability of these markers. Results In our cohort of 587 patients undergoing TAVR with self-expandable valves, multivariable logistic regression identified several significant predictors for PPI. Elevated pre-procedural NLR was associated with increased PPI risk (odds ratio [OR] 1.18; p = 0.008), as was the SII (OR 1.0012; p = 0.001). Anatomical and procedural factors also contributed: septum thickness (OR 1.24; p = 0.025), valve size (OR 1.10; p = 0.025), and longer procedure time (OR 1.013; p = 0.003). Post-dilatation was associated with reduced PPI risk (OR 0.54; p = 0.031). Electrical conduction parameters, including QRS duration (OR 1.015; p = 0.018) and presence of right bundle branch block (RBBB) (OR 4.64; p = 0.027), were significant predictors. The model demonstrated strong discriminative ability with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8628, indicating high accuracy in distinguishing patients at risk for PPI post-TAVR. Conclusions We developed a predictive equation combining inflammatory, anatomical, and procedural factors to estimate PPI risk after TAVR. This tool demonstrated high accuracy and clinical utility, supporting personalized risk assessment, procedural planning, and improved patient outcomes in TAVR populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khadija et al. (2026) studied this question. A predictive model incorporating inflammatory markers, anatomical factors, and right bundle branch block (OR 4.64) accurately predicted pacemaker implantation after TAVR (AUC 0.8628).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: