Real-world evidence demonstrates molecular residual disease testing's potential to inform colorectal cancer management.
Background: Despite well-established treatment and follow-up protocols for the management of colorectal cancer patients, recurrences are frequent. Post curative therapy, ctDNA-based molecular residual disease assessment has the ability to stratify patients into higher and lower risks of recurrence. Large-scale clinical trials are necessary to establish utility at a broad level, but physicians also need real-world evidence and case reports before utilizing MRD testing in routine practice. Methods: We analyzed real-world utilization patterns of Guardant Reveal in patients with CRC across stages by collating information from the test request form after the test was ordered as a part of routine practice in the AMEA region. Results: We report that 92% of the tests were utilized for stage II and stage III patients. The timing of the first MRD test order varies between stages, with a higher proportion of tests being ordered within the first 12 weeks of surgery for stage II (71.8%), while for stage III (50%) and stage IV oligometastatic (72%), the first test was ordered after 12 weeks of surgery. Conclusions: Case reports delineate physicians’ perspectives on actions taken on the basis of MRD test results and outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hsieh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: