Retrospective study evaluates craniofacial outcomes of PVPS in children with cleft lip, indicating localized growth effects.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of single-stage posterior vomerine ostectomy with premaxillary setback (PVPS) on craniofacial development in children with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) and a protuberant premaxilla.DesignRetrospective pilot study.SettingResource-limited outreach setting.Patients, ParticipantsFifty-two children were included: 22 with BCLP who underwent PVPS before 8 years of age and 30 age-matched non-cleft controls.InterventionsSingle-stage PVPS with bilateral gingivoperiosteoplasties, bilateral cleft lip repair, and primary rhinoplasty.Main Outcome Measure(s)Twenty-two cephalometric parameters assessed post-operatively; intergroup comparisons made using the Mann-Whitney U-test with post-hoc power analysis.ResultsOf 22 cephalometric variables, 16 showed no statistically significant differences between PVPS-treated and control groups, indicating minimal overall impact of PVPS on craniofacial growth. Significant differences were noted in SNA (P = .05), ANB (P = .02), N-A-Pog (P < .01), A-Ptm (P < .01), (ANS-Ptm/M-Me)% (P = .03), and HSTA (P < .01). These differences reflected localized or subtle growth effects rather than global craniofacial alterations.ConclusionsPVPS appears to preserve craniofacial growth in the preadolescent period in BCLP patients with a protruding premaxilla, with limited and localized impact on specific parameters. While not recommended when preoperative orthodontics is available, PVPS provides a valuable alternative in resource-limited settings by achieving adequate results, reducing psychosocial stigma, improving societal integration, and consolidating surgical interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hamdan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: