Cross-sectional study evaluates outcomes of antibiotic therapy in febrile children, suggesting improved diagnostics needed.
Background: Fever is one of the most common presenting complaints in pediatric practice and is frequently managed with empiric antibiotic therapy, particularly in resource-limited settings where diagnostic uncertainty persists. Objectives: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of empiric antibiotic therapy in febrile children. Methods: This hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted at Al-Khansaa Teaching Hospital, Mosul, Iraq, from March 2025 to February 2026. A total of 250 children aged ≤14 years presenting with fever (≥38°C) and receiving empiric antibiotic therapy were included. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, treatment, and outcome data were collected and analyzed using appropriate statistical tests. Results: The mean age was 36.2 ± 28.5 months, with a male predominance (56.4%). The majority of patients were aged 12–59 months (43.6%). Fever was present in 100% of cases, followed by cough (50.8%), poor feeding (40.8%), vomiting (36.4%), and diarrhea (30.8%). Leukocytosis was observed in 53.3% of tested patients, while 67.7% had positive C-reactive protein. Ceftriaxone was the most commonly prescribed antibiotic (48%), followed by ampicillin plus gentamicin (24.4%) and amoxicillin–clavulanate (15.6%). Clinical improvement within three days was achieved in 70.4% of patients, whereas 17.6% showed delayed improvement and 12% experienced treatment failure. The mortality rate was 3.2%. Conclusion: Empiric antibiotic therapy in febrile children produced generally positive short-term outcomes; however, the high rate of antibiotic use, as well as the presence of treatment failure and mortality, indicate the need for improved diagnostic tools and antimicrobial stewardship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
1*Dr. Bakir Siddeeq Abdul Kareem, 2Dr. Anas Aziz Mohammed, 3Dr. Yusuf Mahmod Hasan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: