Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates an improved performance evaluation model for building construction enterprises, suggesting enhanced predictive accuracy in dynamic environments.
Under the combined pressures of dual carbon policy constraints, the integration of intelligent construction technologies, and intensifying market competition, the development of a scientific and robust performance evaluation system has become essential for building construction enterprises seeking to enhance their core competitiveness. Traditional evaluation methods, however, often suffer from incomplete indicator systems and limited capability in addressing high-dimensional and nonlinear problems, rendering them inadequate for the evolving demands of the industry. To address these challenges, this study proposes a performance evaluation model for building construction enterprises based on the least squares support vector machine (LSSVM), optimized by an improved Pied Kingfisher Optimizer (IPKO). Drawing on environment–behavior theory, the model incorporates three environmental and ten behavioral factors. To overcome the limitations of the original PKO algorithm—namely, insufficient exploration capability and weak local search—the exploration phase of PKO is integrated with that of the Marine Predators Algorithm. Empirical results demonstrate that: (1) the proposed IPKO outperforms Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), Sparrow Search Algorithm (SSA), Dung Beetle Optimizer (DBO), Ospery Optimization Algorithm (OOA), and the original PKO in most benchmark functions; (2) the ReliefF feature selection algorithm improves the model’s test set accuracy by approximately 2.18%; and (3) the IPKO-LSSVM model achieves 6.53%, 4.16%, and 6.74% higher prediction accuracy than Backpropagation Neural Networks (BPNN), Random Forest (RF), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), respectively. These findings highlight the model’s effectiveness in addressing small-sample, high-dimensional, and nonlinear problems, offering a scientifically sound and practical tool for performance evaluation in building construction enterprises.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: