PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics0 citationsOpen Access

International Ethical Principles for Banking and Secondary Research Use of Human Biospecimens and Associated Data: The Seattle Principles

MBMark BarnesMBMarianna J. BledsoeMKMayumi Kusunose

Key Points

  • The research aims to establish ethical principles for the use and sharing of human biospecimens to promote scientific advancement.
  • Identification of challenges in biospecimen sharing
  • Development of ethical principles for biobanking
  • Assessment of existing regulatory frameworks
  • Analysis of cultural perspectives in biobanking practices
  • Proposed ethical principles to guide biospecimen use
  • Call for harmonization of national regulations
  • Highlighting the need for cultural sensitivity in biospecimen collection
  • Emphasis on the importance of diversity in biospecimen datasets

Abstract

International access to and sharing of biospecimens is critical to answer important questions about complex diseases, and to ensure the diversity in biospecimen collection necessary to advance science and develop therapies that benefit all. However, many challenges exist. These include the lack of harmonized ethical, legal, and policy frameworks regarding secondary uses of biospecimens and associated data; regulatory and policy hurdles; and differences in cultural perspectives and practices across regional and national jurisdictions.In this manuscript, a set of ethical principles is presented with the intent to address some of these challenges by ensuring better alignment in ethical practices related to biobanking and the global use of human biospecimens. In addition, these principles could serve as a basis for promoting more consistency among national regulations and policies. The ultimate goal is to develop an international framework for global biospecimen and data sharing.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Barnes et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ccb79916edfba7beb8999bhttps://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2026.10252
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Rules for processing genetic data for research purposes in view of the new EU General Data Protection Regulation2017 · 172 citations
  2. 2Researchers to Return Blood Samples to the Yanomamö2010 · 39 citations
  3. 3Custodianship as an Ethical Framework for Biospecimen-Based Research2010 · 76 citations
  4. 4Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) in Healthcare: A Systematic Review2024 · 22 citations
  5. 5Data retention after a patient withdraws consent in clinical trials2011 · 16 citations