Why the study?
Prior data suggests that older adults (>75 years) are sub-optimally treated for both primary and secondary prevention of ASCVD events despite ACC/AHA recommendations for high-intensity statins.
Does guideline directed statin intensity (high-intensity statins) reduce recurrent ASCVD events and mortality in older adults (>75 years) with established ASCVD compared to lower intensity or no statin?
Does guideline directed statin intensity (high-intensity statins) reduce recurrent ASCVD events and mortality in older adults (>75 years) with established ASCVD compared to lower intensity or no statin?
High-intensity statin therapy is significantly underutilized in older adults (>75 years) with ASCVD, despite being associated with substantial reductions in recurrent MI, stroke, and mortality compared to lower-intensity therapy.
May support high-intensity statins in older adults with ASCVD; observational data leave open causality and need for RCTs.
Introduction: The ACC/AHA guidelines recommend that patients with established ASCVD should be on high intensity statins for secondary prevention. Prior data suggests that older adults (>75 years) are sub-optimally treated for both primary and secondary prevention of ASCVD events. We investigated guideline directed statin intensity (GDSI) use, associated LDL cholesterol levels and ASCVD outcomes in a cohort of older adults in a large healthcare network. Methods: EMR data was abstracted to assess statin prescriptions between 2010-2020 amongst adults with known ASCVD (CAD, ischemic stroke/TIA or PAD). Prescriptions of statins as GDSI (high intensity), <GDSI (low/moderate intensity), and no statin were assessed and stratified by age groups. LDL-C levels across the follow up time were calculated. Cox regression models were used to assess HRs (Hazard Ratios) for repeat ASCVD event (MI and stroke/TIA) and all cause death, stratified by age and GDSI treatment. Results: Over ~5y follow up, amongst adults aged>75 years (n=11,596), less than half (49.6%) were on GDSI and only ~54% older adults achieved LDL-c<70mg/dL. Compared to GDSI use, older adults on <GDSI had a greater incidence of recurrent MI [HR>75y 1.59; 95% CI (1.30-1.95)], stroke [HR>75 1.659; 95% CI (1.21-2.24)] and mortality [HR>75 1.88; 95% CI (1.57-2.25)]; all p<0.01 in <GDSI group vs GDSI group. GDSI use had a greater reduction of MI and mortality in older adults than younger counterparts [Table 1]. Conclusions: In this contemporary healthcare network, GDSI use for secondary prevention and LDL-C<70 mg/dL was suboptimal amongst all age groups. Any statin use conferred a greater reduction in MI and mortality amongst older adults >75y. Systemic interventions for guideline implementation and optimal statin use in older adults with ASCVD should be explored further.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Acharya et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: