PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026Engineering Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Effect of PWHT and Electrical Parameters on Austenitic Phase, Sigma Phase and Corrosion in Duplex Steels S32205

View Full Paper
SCSandra Chacón‐FernándezJMJosé L. Meseguer‐ValdenebroAMAndrea Peña Martín

Key Points

  • The study aims to understand how post-weld heat treatments affect phase evolution and corrosion in duplex stainless steel UNS S32205.
  • Investigated effects of PWHT at 450, 850, and 1020°C on phase structure and corrosion behavior
  • Welded duplex stainless steel using GMAW
  • Conducted ASTM G48 pitting corrosion testing to evaluate mass loss
  • Ferrite content decreased as PWHT temperature increased, with formation of secondary austenite
  • 850°C PWHT resulted in highest sigma phase content (up to ~5%) and greatest mass loss (0.35%–0.40%)
  • At 1020°C, sigma phase dissolution led to significantly lower mass loss (less than 0.1%)

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates the influence of post‐weld heat treatments (PWHT) at 450, 850°C and 1020°C on phase evolution and corrosion behavior in UNS S32205 duplex stainless steel welded with GMAW. The ferrite content decreased progressively with an increase in the temperature of PWHT, accompanied by the formation of secondary austenite. Treatment at 850°C produced the highest phase fractions in sigma ( σ ), phase fractions—up to ∼5% in the fusion zone (FZ)—which corresponded to the greatest mass loss during ASTM G48 pitting corrosion testing (0.35%–0.40%). At 1020°C, σ ‐phase dissolution resulted in substantially lower mass loss (< 0.1%). A significant outcome of this work is the demonstration that a 1‐h PWHT at 850°C applied to the base metal reproduces the microstructural characteristics of a welded heat‐affected zone (HAZ), enabling its characterization on larger and more uniform specimens. These results confirm that σ ‐phase formation is governed exclusively by PWHT temperature.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chacón‐Fernández et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cd7a4e5652765b073a74a3https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.70654
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Microstructural Transformation and Hardness Response of TIG‐Welded UNS S31803 Duplex Stainless Steel Subjected to Post‐Weld Heat Treatment2026
  2. 2A comparison of microstructure and mechanical characteristics correlation of the joint specimens for duplex stainless steel UNS S32304 and super-duplex stainless steel UNS S32750: The role of post-weld heat treatment2024 · 17 citations
  3. 3Influence of Heat Treatment Temperature on Microstructure, Hardness and Sensitization of UNS S32205 Duplex Stainless Steel2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4Optimization of Microstructure and Pitting Corrosion Resistance in Laser‐Welded UNS S32001 Lean Duplex Stainless Steel Joints by Post Weld Heat Treatment2026
  5. 5The relationship between austenite stabiliser element and post-weld heat treatment on the corrosion behaviour of the welded duplex stainless steel made by gas tungsten arc welding2024 · 11 citations