PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Combined Effect of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Homocysteine on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Coronary Heart Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BZBaozhen ZhuNingxia Medical UniversityXLXu LuoSouthwest University of Science and TechnologyPWPeng WuSouth China Agricultural University

Key Result

Concurrent elevation of LDL-C and homocysteine nearly doubled the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (HR 1.97) in patients with coronary heart disease compared to those with low levels.

Key Points

  • To investigate the combined effect of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and homocysteine (HCY) on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in coronary heart disease (CHD).
  • Conducted a retrospective cohort study with patients diagnosed with CHD via angiography from January 2019 to December 2021.
  • Stratified patients based on LDL-C and HCY levels.
  • Analyzed occurrences of major adverse cardiovascular events over a 25-month period.
  • Recorded 744 major adverse cardiovascular events during follow-up.
  • High LDL-C levels presented an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.38 for MACEs.
  • High homocysteine levels presented an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.47 for MACEs.
  • Combined high LDL-C and high homocysteine led to a markedly increased risk with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.97.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=5,137)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does the combination of elevated LDL-C and elevated homocysteine increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary heart disease?

P
Population
5,137 adults (aged ≥18 years) with confirmed coronary heart disease (≥50% stenosis in one or more major coronary arteries), mean age 62.66, 68.6% male, Chinese cohort. Key exclusion criteria: severe concomitant illnesses (advanced cancer or end-stage renal disease), absent or incomplete data, loss to follow-up.
I
Intervention
Elevated baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C ≥1.8 mmol/L) and elevated baseline homocysteine (HCY ≥15 μmol/L)
C
Comparator
Low baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L) and low baseline homocysteine (HCY <15 μmol/L)
O
Outcome
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, acute myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization at 25 months follow-upcomposite

The combined elevation of LDL-C and homocysteine synergistically increases the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary heart disease, suggesting that dual-biomarker assessment can improve secondary prevention risk stratification.

Main Result

Effect estimate: HR 1.97 (95% CI 1.34-2.90)

Absolute Event Rate: 17.6% vs 8.3%

p-value: p=0.001

Limitations

  • Retrospective, single-center design may affect generalizability and introduce selection bias
  • Only baseline measurements of LDL-C and HCY were available, missing fluctuations over time
  • Residual confounding cannot be entirely ruled out due to unmeasured variables like diet and genetics
  • Loss to follow-up may have introduced bias
  • Study cohort comprised only Chinese patients, potentially limiting extrapolation to other ethnicities
  • Only baseline measurements of LDL-C and HCY were available; fluctuations were not captured
  • Residual confounding cannot be entirely ruled out due to unmeasured variables (dietary habits, genetic factors, inflammatory markers, medication compliance)
  • Cohort comprised only Chinese patients, potentially limiting extrapolation to other ethnic populations

Abstract

Background: Residual cardiovascular risk remains substantial despite aggressive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering in coronary heart disease (CHD). Consequently, this elevated risk has spurred the search for non-lipid targets, such as homocysteine (HCY). However, the combined effect of HCY with LDL-C and the overall potential for combined risk stratification remain unclear. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with CHD confirmed by coronary angiography or computed tomography angiography at the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University between January 2019 and December 2021. Participants were stratified by baseline LDL-C levels (<1.8 vs. ≥1.8 mmol/L) and HCY (<15 vs. ≥15 μmol/L). Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) were employed as the primary endpoint, defined as a composite of all-cause death, stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization. Results: A total of 744 MACEs were recorded during the 25-month follow-up. Elevated levels of LDL-C (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.38, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09–1.73) and HCY (aHR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.19–1.81) were independently associated with a higher risk of MACEs. The risk was synergistic when both factors were elevated, as patients in the high LDL-C and high HCY group had a significantly increased risk (aHR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.34–2.90) compared to the reference group with low levels. Conclusion: LDL-C and HCY are independent predictors of MACEs in patients with CHD, and the combined use of these indices improves risk stratification. Thus, integrating these indices into clinical practice could improve personalized management strategies and outcomes in this high-risk population.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Coronary Heart Disease (n=5,137). High LDL-C (≥1.8 mmol/L) and High HCY (≥15 µmol/L) vs. Low LDL-C (<1.8 mmol/L) and Low HCY (<15 µmol/L) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.34-2.90, p=0.001). Concurrent elevation of LDL-C and homocysteine nearly doubled the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (HR 1.97) in patients with coronary heart disease compared to those with low levels.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cd7a4e5652765b073a74aahttps://doi.org/10.31083/rcm46290
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper