Analysis describes nouns in Tutuba language, highlighting their meanings in Bislama and English.
In the Republic of Vanuatu, more than 100 indigenous vernacular languages are spoken on 83 islands. Tutuba language, one of these vernacular languages of Vanuatu, is used in the islated Tutuba Island. This language has about 500 speakers1). To the best of our knowledge, New Hebrides Languages 2) that contained approximately 300 vocabularies of Tutuba language is supposed to be the only previous research. This paper focuses on nouns of Tutuba vocabularies, and describes their meanings with many examples in Bislama3),4) and English. This paper will particularly focus on the vocabularies beginning with T, as listed below, and this is the continuation of the paper, Nouns in Tutuba Language (S), that was published in 2018. The construction of each unit is shown as follows. 1. Tutuba word 2. meaning in Bislama 3. meaning in English 4. Tutuba example sentence 5. the glossary of the Tutuba example sentence 6. meaning of Tutuba example sentence in Bislama 7. meaning of Tutuba example sentence in English. In this language, subject pronoun has a realis/irrealis distinction, and the third person singular object enclitic form is =a, except after transitive verbs ending in a. In this case, the form is =e, instead. Prenasalized stops [mb] and [nd] are written as b, d, [ß] is written as v, and linguolabial [m ̼ ], [b̼ ] and [v̼] are written as [m’], [b’] and [v’]. Abbreviations used in this paper are as follows. 1/2/3: first person/ second person/ third person, art: article, B: Bislama, caus: causative, class: classifier, conjn: conjunction, dx: deixis, E: English, exc: exclusive, G: Gloss, imp: imperative, inc: inclusive, irr: irrealis, itj: interjection, link: linker, n: noun, neg: negative, nmlz: nominalization, obj: object, pl: plural, poss: possessive, pp: preposition, r: realis, red: reduplication, ref: referential, rep: repititive, sg: singular, vt: transitive verb, =: clitic marker, -: suffix marker
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maho NAITO (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: