Identifies how belief revision can qualify as reasoning, suggesting a new theoretical framework.
This paper identifies when a process of belief revision qualifies as theoretical reasoning. Starting from the idea that reasoning should be understood via its epistemological role, it presents a novel account whereby what turns a process of belief revision into reasoning is how it is endorsed . This enables us to solve many of the central difficulties connected to creating a theory of reasoning, as well as to account for how different types of theoretical reasoning are all instances of reasoning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sindre Olaussen Søderstrøm (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: