This analysis examines a 1642 pamphlet discussing a military incident in Hull, contrasting royalist and parliamentary viewpoints, suggesting differences in historical narrative.
This paper constitutes an exercise in the critical analysis of historical media discourse. It presents an investigation of a pamphlet published in London in 1642 concerning a military incident that took place at the strategically important town of Hull in East Yorkshire during the build-up to the start of the English Civil War. The analysis shows how the pamphlet combines a number of elements including the ominous tale of a miraculous ‘toad fish’, a prayer and news of the incident itself. It also shows how the pamphlet reports on the incident from a royalist perspective and contrasts this with another report of the same event from a parliamentary perspective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Edward Haig (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: