Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explores how spatial, institutional, relational, and political dynamics interact in interpersonal relationships, suggesting new analytical frameworks.
Interpersonal relationships underpin everything that is ‘social’ or ‘political’ and are fundamentally spatial, therefore a core concern for human geography. Yet despite the growing dominance of relational approaches, geographical scholarship on interpersonal relationships remains limited and fragmented. Geographies of intimacy, encounter, care, and emotion offer rich insight into the spatiality of interpersonal relationships, yet limited dialogue between them constrains our ability to theorise interpersonal relationships as a coherent object of geographical analysis. This paper advances a more joined-up field of geographies of interpersonal relationships to explore how the spatial, institutional, relational, and political dynamics of interpersonal relationships interact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ilan Wiesel (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: