Hypotheses are the foundation of scientific inquiry, yet their formulation is often treated as an intuitive process rather than a systematic skill. Philosophers like Aristotle, Bacon, and Popper have identified traits of good hypotheses--clarity, testability, and falsifiability--but offer little practical guidance on creating them. This gap leaves researchers relying on ad hoc methods, leading to vague hypotheses, biased results, and poor reproducibility. This paper introduces a systematic framework for hypothesis formulation, guiding researchers in identifying key variables, defining measurable relationships, and ensuring testability. By reducing ambiguity and fostering precision, this approach enhances the quality and impact of hypothesis-driven research.
Wai Ling LAI (2025) studied this question.