Validity and Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the Danish Insomnia Severity Index for People with Persistent Spinal Pain

Jacob S Gandløse; Martine Karoline Mo Sandvik; Thorvaldur Skuli Palsson; Steffan Wittrup McPhee Christensen

doi:10.1080/15402002.2026.2652446

March 30, 2026Behavioral Sleep MedicineOpen Access

Validity and Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the Danish Insomnia Severity Index for People with Persistent Spinal Pain

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

The research aims to assess the validity and reliability of the Danish Insomnia Severity Index (ISI-DK) in people suffering from persistent spinal pain.
Evaluated the Danish Insomnia Severity Index in individuals with persistent spinal pain.
Assessed the tool's validity and reliability in both clinical and research contexts.
Analyzed changes in insomnia severity over time.
The ISI-DK was found to be a valid and reliable instrument for assessing insomnia.
Clinically meaningful changes in insomnia were detectable using the ISI-DK.

Implication

Evaluates insomnia assessment in individuals with persistent spinal pain, indicating its practical application.

Abstract

These findings support the ISI-DK as a valid and reliable instrument for assessing insomnia in individuals with persistent spinal pain, suitable for detecting clinically meaningful changes in both clinical practice and research settings.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Gandløse et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf588f5a333a821460991d https://doi.org/10.1080/15402002.2026.2652446

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Validity and Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the Danish Insomnia Severity Index for People with Persistent Spinal Pain

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Validity and Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the Danish Insomnia Severity Index for People with Persistent Spinal Pain

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading