Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Biodegradable iodinated nanoparticles enable effective thrombus visualization in a novel imaging approach, suggesting improved diagnostic capabilities.
Polymer-based organic nanoparticles enabling direct imaging of cerebral thrombus were developed, distinguishing them from conventional methods that depend on vascular imaging to identify thrombus localization. The HEATI (bis(2-hydroxyethyl) 5-amino-2,4,6-triiodoisophthalate) monomer, synthesized from ATIPA (5-amino-2,4,6-triiodoisophthalic acid), was engineered to contain 58.9 wt % iodine for enhanced X-ray attenuation, confirmed by ¹H NMR spectroscopy. The polymerization of HEATI with oxalyl chloride resulted in a ROS-degradable iodinated polymer (IP-HEATI), as evidenced by the disappearance of the hydroxyl hydrogen peak in the NMR spectrum and a GPC-measured average molecular weight of 2800 g mol⁻¹. Fib-GC@IP-HEATI nanoparticles were formed through nanoprecipitation, yielding a hydrodynamic diameter of 197.2 ± 64.0 nm and a zeta potential of +24.8 mV. The conjugation of fibrin-targeting peptides increased the size to 255.9 ± 64.2 nm. In vitro assays revealed that Fib-GC@IP-HEATI had superior fibrin-binding affinity compared to GC@IP-HEATI, demonstrated by lower IP-HEATI concentrations in the supernatant. Furthermore, GPC analysis showed that IP-HEATI degraded rapidly in the presence of H₂O₂, with complete degradation within 24 h. In vivo imaging confirmed effective thrombus visualization volume with both GC@IP-HEATI and Fib-GC@IP-HEATI at 30 min after intravenous injection. The imaging-derived thrombus visualization volume decreased substantially within 48 h, consistent with nanoparticle degradation. In conclusion, Fib-GC@IP-HEATI enables imaging of both carotid and cerebral thrombi while undergoing time-dependent degradation, outperforming conventional iodine-based small molecule agents that are unable to visualize thrombi and provide a quantitative assessment of their burden.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: