Key result
Positive preoperative toxicology screen linked to higher anesthetic doses and ~184% more 30-day complications.
Why the study?
Preoperative substance use is increasingly observed among metabolic and bariatric surgery candidates, but its perioperative and 1-year effects remain unclear in the Middle East and North Africa.
Does a positive preoperative toxicology screening test predict increased anesthetic requirements and worse short-term outcomes in adults undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery?
Cohort (n=1,260)
Double-blind
No
Does a positive preoperative toxicology screening test predict increased anesthetic requirements and worse short-term outcomes in adults undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 5.4% vs 1.9%
p-value: p=0.015
Routine preoperative toxicology screening in bariatric surgery candidates identifies undisclosed substance use, which is associated with increased anesthetic needs, delayed recovery, and higher early postoperative morbidity.
Supports routine preoperative toxicology screening in bariatric candidates; hypothesis-generating for tailored perioperative strategies.
Preoperative substance use is increasingly observed among candidates for metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), yet its perioperative and 1-year effects remain unclear in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). We assessed whether routine preoperative urine toxicology screening tests (TSTs) predict anesthetic requirements, recovery, early complications, and 1-year weight loss. Prospective single-center cohort of 1,260 primary MBS patients (Alexandria, Egypt; Dec 2023–May 2024). All underwent urine screening for seven substance classes and were classified as TST-positive or TST-negative. Outcomes included propofol and intraoperative fentanyl doses, recovery metrics, postoperative pain (VAS) and opioid requirements, 30-day complications/readmissions, length of stay, and 1-year percent total and excess weight loss (%TWL, %EWL). Inverse propensity score weighting (IPSW) balanced baseline covariates. One-year outcomes were available for 1,134 of 1,260 patients (90.0%). 190 out of 1,260 (15.1%) were TST-positive—most commonly tramadol (57.9%) and cannabis (36.8%); 12.1% denied use despite a positive TST. After IPSW adjustment, TST-positive patients required more propofol (mean difference 49.7 mg; p < 0.001) and fentanyl (MD 51.2 µg; p < 0.001), experienced longer recovery times (MD 5.36 min; p < 0.001), had higher postoperative VAS scores and opioid requirements, longer hospital stays (p < 0.001), and increased 30-day complications (5.4% vs. 1.9%; p = 0.015) and readmissions (7.1% vs. 1.6%; p < 0.001). Routine preoperative TST identifies patients at risk for increased anesthetic/analgesic needs, delayed recovery, agitation, and higher early morbidity. Incorporating TST into preoperative pathways may optimize perioperative planning in MENA settings. NCT07100314. TST-positive patients required higher anesthetic doses and longer, agitated recovery. TST-positive patients reported higher pain scores and greater 24-h opioid consumption. TST-positive patients had more 30-day chest infections and readmissions for vomiting. Undisclosed TST-positivity (12.1%) supports objective screening in the MENA region.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hany et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Obesity (Candidates for metabolic and bariatric surgery) (n=1,260). Positive preoperative urine toxicology screening test (TST-positive) vs. Negative preoperative urine toxicology screening test (TST-negative) was evaluated on 30-day complications (p=0.015). Patients with a positive preoperative toxicology screening test required significantly higher anesthetic doses and experienced increased 30-day complications (5.4% vs. 1.9%) compared to negative tests.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: