This research demonstrates improved anti-tumor effects in gastric cancer peritoneal metastases using a novel treatment combining CF33-hNIS and PD-L1 blockade.
Background Peritoneal metastasis (PM) from gastric cancer (GC) is associated with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. We investigated a novel peritoneal-targeted therapy using CF33-human sodium iodide symporter (hNIS), a chimeric orthopoxvirus, combined with anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade in an immunocompetent mouse model of GCPM. Methods We evaluated replication and cytotoxicity of CF33-hNIS in human and murine GC cell lines. We assessed a syngeneic mouse model of PM using the transgenic mouse GC ACKPY3944 cells to test the efficacy of intraperitoneal (IP) CF33-hNIS alone and combined with intravenous or IP anti-PD-L1. Next, we performed flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry to analyze immune cell populations of CD3 + T cell subsets in the peritoneal cavity and tumor microenvironment. Mice that showed complete tumor regression (CTR) were rechallenged with ACKPY3944 cells to assess memory T cell responses. Results CF33-hNIS efficiently infected and killed GC cells. In vivo, IP CF33-hNIS alone significantly prolonged survival and increased infiltration of CD3 + and CD8 + T cells within the peritoneal cavity and solid tumor. The most pronounced therapeutic effect was observed with a single high-dose of CF33-hNIS (10 8 plaque-forming units) combined with IP anti-PD-L1 (Combo 2) with 75% CTR. Notably, mice with CTR rejected tumor rechallenge, exhibiting significantly elevated effector and central memory T cell populations in the peritoneal cavity and spleen. IP CF33-hNIS demonstrates robust anti-tumor efficacy against GCPM, particularly when combined with IP anti-PD-L1 in the high-dose Combo 2 regimen. Conclusions These findings support a simplified, high-dose IP treatment strategy to overcome immune resistance in GCPM and provide a strong rationale for future clinical evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: