The paper sets Bibago’s commentary on Met. B against the broader history of the reception of Aristotle’s dialectic by focusing on two aspects of Bibago’s account of the sense in which Met. B is dialectical: (1) Bibago’s view that dialectical practice is linked to or, perhaps, aimed at raising doubts (sefeqot); (2) the combination of ethical and epistemological considerations in the assessment of the value of dialectic itself.
Laura Castelli (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: