This commentary explores ethical implications of dialectic in Aristotle's work, suggesting a deeper understanding of doubt and ethical growth.
The paper sets Bibago’s commentary on Met. B against the broader history of the reception of Aristotle’s dialectic by focusing on two aspects of Bibago’s account of the sense in which Met. B is dialectical: (1) Bibago’s view that dialectical practice is linked to or, perhaps, aimed at raising doubts (sefeqot); (2) the combination of ethical and epistemological considerations in the assessment of the value of dialectic itself.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laura Castelli (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: