This review uncovers factors affecting prioritisation of infectious pathogens for research, suggesting improved methods are needed.
This study provides the first examination of priority setting exercises identifying high-consequence infectious pathogens. The review reveals important elements of commonality and variability between priority-setting exercises, highlighting areas for improvement to increase the comparability and quality of future efforts and their implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pulik et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: