This analysis explores how soft law strategies shape trade responses to tariffs in ASEAN, suggesting new governance approaches.
This paper analyses how the weaponisation of trade, such as the renewed unilateral tariffs in 2025, reshapes the governance setting for trade-dependent regions. Using ASEAN as a case study, we argue that the region’s reliance on soft law is a deliberate institutional strategy. We examine ASEAN’s structural exposure through global value chains and its fragmented resilience across member states. We then assess how its hybrid legal architecture combines treaty-based obligations with soft-law implementation. We characterise that ASEAN manages external shocks through three mechanisms: proceduralising volatility into coordinated consultation, enabling differentiated coordination to avoid legal deadlock, and sequencing legal development through gradual layering of soft and hard governance. Comparatively, we show that ASEAN represents a distinct model of regional legal ordering positioned between European Union-style of supranational enforcement and APEC-style of voluntarism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Judy Yueh Ling Song (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: