Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This work evaluates NLP techniques for verifying authorship and detecting style changes in text documents, suggesting improvements for academic integrity.
This work addresses critical challenges to academic integrity, including plagiarism, fabrication, and verification of authorship of educational content, by proposing a Natural Language Processing (NLP)-based framework for authenticating students’ content through author attribution and style change detection. Despite some initial efforts, several aspects of the topic are yet to be explored. In contrast to existing solutions, the paper provides a comprehensive analyzis of the topic by targeting four relevant tasks, including (i) classification of human and machine text, (ii) differentiating in single and multi-authored documents, (iii) author change detection within multi-authored documents, and (iv) author recognition in collaboratively produced documents. The solutions proposed for the tasks are evaluated on two datasets generated with Gemini using two different prompts, including a normal and a strict set of instructions. During experiments, some performance reduction is observed for the proposed solutions on the dataset generated by the strict prompt, demonstrating the complexities involved in detecting machine-generated text with cleverly crafted prompts. The generated datasets, code, and other relevant materials are made publicly available on GitHub, which are expected to provide a baseline for future research in the domain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Albaqami et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: