Analysis shows improved energy efficiency in high-power drives, suggesting a promising alternative configuration.
High-power phase-controlled thyristor DC drives, despite their reliability, have a fundamental drawback: significant reactive power consumption from the supply network, especially in dynamic operating modes with large firing angles (α). This leads to a low Displacement Power Factor (DPF) and additional losses. This study analyzes a cost-effective novel two-stage thyristor rectifier topology proposed to mitigate this problem. The topology utilizes a special transformer with secondary winding taps (e.g., at 50% and 100% voltage) that feed two 6-pulse bridges (R1 and R2), connected in parallel to a common DC load. The system functions as a high-speed solid-state equivalent of an On-Load Tap Changer (OLTC). By sequentially engaging the bridges, the converter maintains small firing angles (α) over a wide output voltage range. A detailed analysis of the energy characteristics, based on a case study of a typical acceleration cycle for a high-inertia drive (hoisting machine), demonstrates the topology's energy efficiency. Compared to a conventional single-bridge thyristor rectifier, the two-stage scheme reduces the total reactive energy consumed per acceleration cycle by 51% (from 54.4 kVAr · h to 26.8 kVAr · h in the example). An additional advantage of the solution is the reduction of the Root-Mean-Square (RMS) primary winding current during the initial acceleration stage, which leads to lower active power (I2R) losses in the transformer and supply lines. A drawback of the considered commutation algorithm is the presence of a 'discontinuous current mode' in the transformer primary winding during the mixed-mode (simultaneous operation of R1 and R2), which significantly degrades the harmonic spectrum (THD) of the input current, making the converter non-compliant with power quality standards (e.g., IEEE 519). The study concludes that practically implementing this energy-efficient topology requires hardware adaptation, specifically through the design of a custom Inter-Phase Reactor (IPR) or integration into multi-pulse configurations, to mitigate harmonic distortion while preserving the reactive power benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Komarov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: