Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review examines AI's role in drug discovery, highlighting ethical advancements and scientific challenges.
Despite rapid advances in computational biology and regulatory reforms encouraging the reduction of animal use, a clear synthesis of how artificial intelligence (AI)-driven polypharmacology can function as a scientific and ethical bridge between traditional in vivo pharmacology and human-relevant drug development remains lacking. The shift from cage-based experimentation to code-based predictive modeling presents both opportunities and unresolved challenges in biological interpretation, regulatory acceptance, and pharmacology education. Therefore, this review aims to critically examine the transition toward AI-enabled, human-centric drug discovery within the framework of the 3R principles (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement). Specifically, it explores (i) the global regulatory and ethical drivers accelerating non-animal methodologies, (ii) the scientific and educational gaps emerging from reduced dependence on animal models, and (iii) the role of AI and deep learning in reconstructing biological complexity through multi-omics integration and predictive toxicity modeling. By analyzing emerging AI platforms and computational strategies, this review highlights how AI-driven polypharmacology may offer a scalable, ethical, and precision-oriented framework for future pharmacological research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chaskar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: