PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Hepatology Communications0 citationsOpen Access

Risk-stratified surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma

View Full Paper
THThomas HunoldNPNeehar D. Parikh

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of risk-stratified surveillance methods for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared to standard approaches.
  • Critical evaluation of existing HCC risk stratification models
  • Assessment of clinical, biomarker-based, and imaging-based techniques
  • Analysis of limitations in current surveillance guidelines
  • Several models show promising performance in risk stratification
  • Many models lack robust external validation and do not represent all patient demographics
  • Emphasis on the need for prospective studies to validate risk-stratified approaches

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with most cases arising in patients with cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis B. Current guidelines recommend semi-annual ultrasound with or without alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) testing for all at-risk individuals; however, this one-size-fits-all approach has important limitations, including suboptimal sensitivity, frequent false-positive results, poor adherence, and failure to account for substantial heterogeneity in individual HCC risk. Risk-stratified surveillance has emerged as a potential strategy to better balance surveillance benefits and harms by tailoring surveillance intensity and modality to patient-specific risk. We summarize and critically evaluate existing HCC risk stratification models, including clinical, biomarker-based, and imaging-based or elastography-based approaches. Although several models demonstrate promising performance, many lack robust external validation, underrepresent patients with metabolic and alcohol-associated liver disease, and inadequately account for competing risks such as non–liver-related mortality. We further discuss key challenges to implementing risk-stratified surveillance in clinical practice. Overall, while risk-stratified HCC surveillance has several promising characteristics over current paradigms, prospective validation and implementation studies are needed before widespread adoption. Aligning surveillance strategies with individualized risk has the potential to improve outcomes in patients at risk for HCC.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hunold et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5dd55a333a821460bcbfhttps://doi.org/10.1097/hc9.0000000000000943
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper