Study evaluates reliability and validity of agility and manipulation tests in adults with musculoskeletal disorders, suggesting their effectiveness.
[Purpose] Study assessed test-retest reliability, minimal detectable change (MDC95), concurrent validity, and known-groups validity of Two Square Agility Test (TSAT) and WorkAbility Rate of Manipulation (WRM) in adults with musculoskeletal disorders. [Participants and Methods] Fifty-five participants (mean age: 61.3 ± 15.3 years) transitioning from physical therapy completed TSAT and WRM subtests for Turning (WRMT) and Placing (WRMP) in both sessions. In session 2, participants also completed Grip Strength (GS), 10-Meter Walk at usual (GSU) and fast (GSF) pace, and Grooved Pegboard Placing (GPP) and Remove (GPR). [Results] Test-retest reliability was good for TSAT (ICC=0.89) and WRMT (ICC=0.86), and excellent for WRMP (ICC=0.93). MDC95 was 0.74 steps/sec for TSAT, 13.1 parts/min for WRMT, and 6.5 parts/min for WRMP. TSAT correlated moderately with GSF (r=0.52) and GSU (r=0.50). WRMT and WRMP correlated highly (r=0.71). WRMT correlated highly with GPP (r=0.74), low with GPR (r=0.46) and negligible with GS (r=0.17). WRMP correlated highly with GPP (r=0.79), moderately with GPR (r=0.55) and negligible with GS (r=0.20). WRM differed by age and TSAT by age and body mass index. [Conclusions] Findings support reliability and validity of TSAT and WRM to assess adults with musculoskeletal disorders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wickstrom et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: