PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026AI4 citationsOpen Access

Artificial Intelligence and Youth: Cognitive, Educational, and Behavioral Impacts

View Full Paper
DGDaniele GiansantiCCClaudia Cosenza

Key Points

  • This review evaluates how AI and GenAI usage affects cognition, education, and behavior in youth and young professionals.
  • Narrative review synthesizing empirical studies.
  • Utilized psychometric instruments to assess AI engagement.
  • Examined international policy frameworks on AI use.
  • AI improves learning efficiency and creativity while aiding professional decision-making.
  • Excessive AI use may lead to cognitive offloading and dependency behaviors.
  • Instruments like CAIDS and PCGUS identify maladaptive technology use.

Abstract

Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Generative AI (GenAI) are increasingly integrated into educational and professional settings, offering personalized learning, productivity gains, and enhanced engagement. However, excessive reliance may compromise critical thinking, autonomous problem-solving, and emotional regulation among youth (i.e., adolescents and young adults) and early-career professionals. Aim: This review examines the cognitive, educational, and behavioral impacts of AI and GenAI use in youth, highlighting implications for their responsible integration in learning and professional development. Methods: A narrative review was conducted, synthesizing empirical studies, psychometric instruments, and international policy frameworks addressing AI engagement. Emphasis was placed on cognitive, behavioral, educational, and ethical dimensions across youth and early-career professionals. Results: AI enhances learning efficiency, creativity, and professional decision-making but may also foster cognitive offloading, dependency, and addiction-like behaviors. Instruments such as the Conversational AI Dependence Scale (CAIDS) and the Problematic ChatGPT Use Scale (PCGUS) help identify maladaptive patterns. Effective strategies include structured pedagogy, human oversight, reflective practice, AI literacy, and ethical guidance. Paradoxically, higher AI competence and trust may increase reliance, underscoring the need for guided and balanced engagement. Conclusions: Responsible AI integration requires multidimensional approaches combining instructional scaffolding, metacognitive strategies, supervision, and governance to preserve autonomy, professional judgment, and cognitive development in youth.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Giansanti et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5e115a333a821460c423https://doi.org/10.3390/ai7040121
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper