Analysis reveals effective collective action strategies for sustainability challenges among diverse stakeholders, indicating a need for integrated approach.
Sustainability challenges require collective action (CA) among diverse stakeholders, yet current management scholarship on CA remains theoretically fragmented. Through a comprehensive review and inductive analysis of 140 peer-reviewed management articles at the intersection of CA and sustainability, we highlight three complementary lenses that management scholars have historically used to study CA and sustainability: (1) root dilemmas (i.e., how sustainability challenges emerge from CA problems); (2) response implementation (i.e., how individuals, organizations, and multistakeholder coalitions implement different types of collective responses); and (3) response effectiveness (i.e., the conditions under which certain CA responses prove more or less effective in addressing sustainability challenges). We develop an integrative theoretical model that synthesizes these previously disparate perspectives to help align and move research forward. Overall, our work shows that CA for addressing sustainability challenges is less about working toward a shared goal and more about creating the conditions in which diverse types of actors have the incentive to “get things done together.”
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hertel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: