Demonstrates a model for site selection in photovoltaic power projects, indicating improved decision consensus.
As global climate change intensifies and fossil fuel resources continue to deplete, transitioning to alternative energy sources has become a vital strategy for sustainable development. Photovoltaic (PV) power generation, recognized for its clean, renewable, and low-carbon characteristics, is advancing rapidly. Against this background, site selection for PV power plant stations has become a crucial decision-making factor in ensuring project success. However, in large-scale group decision-making (LGDM), the complex backgrounds and substantial number of decision-makers (DMs) pose a significant challenge in reaching consensus efficiently. Therefore, this paper proposes a multi-objective optimization consensus model (MOOCM) utilizing dynamic trust networks to solve LGDM problems. First, a hybrid trust network (HTN) is built by integrating preference similarity and trust relationships, and DMs are clustered using the Louvain algorithm based on this hybrid network. Second, a MOOCM is designed with the objectives of minimizing costs, maximizing fairness, and achieving a high consensus level. Then, after consensus is reached, the HTN is updated, and secondary clustering is performed to obtain dynamic weights for DMs. Finally, a PV power plant site selection problem with 20 DMs, four alternatives, and four attributes is used as a case study for validation. In the first clustering, the DMs are divided into four subgroups. After consensus is reached, the HTN is updated and a second clustering is performed, which finally produces three subgroups. At the same time, the proposed method can achieve a group consensus level (GCL) of 0.9597, with Cost = 1.7422 and Fairness = 0.9043. These results verify the effectiveness and practical utility of the proposed method in LGDM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: