Research demonstrates effective methods for producing fold-switching proteins, indicating broader applications in biology and medicine.
Fold-switching proteins are an emerging class of biomolecules that respond to subtle cues to regulate biological processes. Expanding our understanding of fold-switching proteins requires reliable methods for preparing new variants with high purity and well-defined thermodynamic properties, but currently these methods remain limited. Here, we describe complementary methods for preparing fold-switching proteins by recombinant expression and, to our knowledge, the first reported total chemical synthesis. We prepared eight proteins derived from Streptococcus protein G: 56-residue GA and GB, with 95 and 98% sequence identity. Four variants were produced by bacterial expression in Escherichia coli as SUMO fusion proteins, followed by traceless on-column cleavage and size-exclusion chromatography to generate the native sequences. The same four variants were also produced by automated flow protein synthesis, followed by RP-HPLC and anion-exchange chromatography purification. Both workflows give highly pure proteins that adopt folded conformations upon chromatographic desalting into phosphate buffer. Circular dichroism shows that the proteins attain the anticipated 3−α or 4β+α topologies. Each pair of recombinant and synthetic proteins adopts a similar conformation, as corroborated by trypsin digestion and 1H NMR studies. Thermodynamic studies show that the melting temperatures are within 1 °C of each other and the energetic differences are less than ±0.1 kcal mol–1. Together, these methods provide benchmarks for dual chemical and biological preparations of fold-switching proteins, facilitating access to broader chemical space to study their structural and thermodynamic properties and to design new proteins with switchable properties for applications in science and medicine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kjerfve et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: